RegisterLogin
Federalists vs. Antifederalists: Why the Battle Over the Constitution Still Matters

Federalists vs. Antifederalists: Why the Battle Over the Constitution Still Matters

Mar
25
Monday
 from 10:30 pm to 12:00 am
Virtual Event

When the Constitutional Convention ended on Sept. 17, 1787, the battle over the Constitution had just begun. The convention drafted a new Constitution for the United States, which required ratification by 9 of the 13 state legislatures. Federalists—including key players such as Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington—advocated for a strong central government. They clashed with opposing Antifederalists—including John Hancock, George Mason, and Patrick Henry—who sought for power to lie within the states and favored the Articles of Confederation. While Federalists ultimately were instrumental in shaping the new Constitution, battles between the two sides played out in each of the original 13 states.

Denver Brunsman, a professor of history at George Washington University, describes the battle of ideas and tactics that surrounded the ratification process and the patterns of political debate—local vs. national, urban vs. rural, elite vs. ordinary citizens—that were introduced and persist to this day.

Conversations Matter

Linktank is devoted to elevating dialogue. We curate important global conversations, bringing together perspectives that shape our world and values.
Since 2009, Linktank began as a curation of the best talks in town, where experts across a broad range of topics — social, political, economic, and cultural — advanced their insight in the battleground of ideas.
Linktank membership gives you unparalleled access to global events and expertise.
Become a Lifetime Member